Unisami AI News

People are benchmarking AI by having it make balls bounce in rotating shapes

January 24, 2025 | by AI

pexels-photo-18068767

AI Benchmarks Get Weird: The Rise of the Bouncing Ball Test

When AI Meets Physics: The Viral Benchmark That’s Taking Over X

Forget traditional benchmarks—AI enthusiasts are now testing models by making them code bouncing balls in rotating shapes. Yes, you read that right. This quirky, physics-based challenge is the latest obsession in the AI community, and it’s revealing some surprising insights about how different models handle complex tasks.

“Write a Python script for a bouncing yellow ball within a shape. Make the shape slowly rotate, and make sure that the ball stays within the shape.”

— The Prompt That Started It All

Who’s Winning the Bouncing Ball Battle?

According to X users, the results are all over the place. Here’s the breakdown:

  • DeepSeek’s R1: Crushed it. This free model outperformed OpenAI’s $200/month ChatGPT Pro in one go.
  • Anthropic’s Claude 3.5 Sonnet & Google’s Gemini 1.5 Pro: Failed physics class. The ball escaped the shape due to poor collision detection.
  • Google’s Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental & OpenAI’s GPT-4o: Nailed it on the first try, proving their coding chops.

Why Does This Even Matter?

Simulating a bouncing ball isn’t just a fun exercise—it’s a classic programming challenge that tests collision detection algorithms and physics accuracy. Poorly written code can lead to glitches, like balls escaping shapes or unrealistic movements. As n8programs, a researcher at AI startup Nous Research, explained:

“One has to track multiple coordinate systems, how collisions are handled, and design the code to be robust from the start.”

— n8programs

But here’s the catch: This test isn’t exactly scientific. Slight changes in the prompt can lead to wildly different results. Some users swear by OpenAI’s o1, while others claim DeepSeek’s R1 is the clear winner. It’s a reminder of how tricky it is to benchmark AI models in a meaningful way.

The Bigger Picture: The Quest for Better AI Benchmarks

While bouncing balls are entertaining, they’re not the future of AI evaluation. Efforts like the ARC-AGI benchmark and Humanity’s Last Exam aim to create more rigorous tests that reflect real-world challenges. Until then, we’ll keep watching GIFs of balls bouncing in rotating shapes and debating which AI reigns supreme.

So, what’s next? Will AI models master quantum physics next? Or maybe they’ll start coding entire video games. One thing’s for sure: the AI community loves a good challenge—no matter how weird it gets.

Image Credit: Google DeepMind on Pexels

RELATED POSTS

View all

view all